What’s in a name?

About Close Tack

I spent a decade leading product teams at Intuit, and most of that decade I thought I was a builder. I was wrong.

Builders ship things. Strategists draw maps. Operators run systems — the product, the team, the org, the incentives, the dependencies — and make them move as one. A builder asks how to make a better widget. An operator asks how to make a better factory.

The people I most admired at Intuit weren’t the best builders. They weren’t the best strategists either. They were operators. And the more I worked with them, the more I realized how rare — and how undervalued — that combination is.

On the name

Close-tacking is the nautical term for finding the optimal course at the minimum possible angle against the wind. It requires precision, constant adjustment, and the discipline to match strategy (how we’ll win the race) with execution (how we’ll get there). Seasoned sailors can’t win races without it.

Seasoned sailors are operators.

On the publication

Close Tack publishes provocations about what really creates velocity in companies and what creates drag: why your best people leave, how AI reshapes team structure, which org design decisions compound over time, and the patterns most leaders miss because they’re moving too fast to notice.

If that’s the kind of thinking you want more of, you’re in the right place.

— Leif

Stay close to the wind

Subscribe to get every new piece in your inbox, full access to the archives, and a heads-up when something worth reading drops. Reading on your phone? The Substack app keeps it all in one place.